Balenciaga recently released some photos of a photoshoot featuring a child holding a teddy bear wearing a bondage outfit. Visible in the photos is a dog collar on the table. And in a carefully laid out set of documents can be seen references to a paedophile case.
The court papers displayed are from the 2008 Supreme Court case, United States v Williams, which criminalised the pandering of child pornography. The ruling reaffirmed the constitutionality of the PROTECT Act, a federal law that increased penalties for sexual exploitation and other abuse of children.
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/balenciaga-plush-bear-bag-holiday-campaign-b2231068.html
The pictures also contained wine glasses on the table with teddies dressed in bondage outfits or fishnet stockings.
Grooming in Western nations is taking place at an exponential rate. The fact 2 well known brand companies can release photos like this shows how they are trying to disrupt human sexuality at a young age for their political agenda.
After the 1960s the Left abandoned Marxism. With this “new left” was replaced hippies, sex obssessed degenerates and ‘free love’. This grouping brought into contact the paedophiles and child abusers.
In the late 1960s, some European liberals thought that breaking down sexual taboos was a task that had to be started young. In German kindergartens run along radical-left lines, teachers encouraged children to fondle them, view pornography and simulate sexual intercourse. Contemporaneous accounts show that parents often felt qualms, which they suppressed because of what they had been told about how children should naturally behave. What happened was child-abuse, though motivated by political conviction rather than sexual desire. But it did not take long before paedophiles saw their chance.
Helen Joyce, Trans
The leaders of the sexual revolution were men whose aims were to legalise homosexuality – and, in some cases, to smash the heterosexual family unit. Few if any wanted to endanger children; they simply did not give children enough thought. Left-wing organisations tolerated groups such as the UK’s Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which had links with the Labour Party and the civil-rights group now called Liberty. In Germany, a political organisation called the Study and Work Group on Paedophilia made remarkable advances. In 1980, a youth group affiliated with the liberal Free Democratic Party adopted pro-paedophilia positions, as did the Green Party, formed the same year.
Paedophiles gained such a hearing on the Left partly by persuading Leftists that their enemies’ enemies were automatically friends. In this case, the enemies were Conservatives, Catholics, evangelicals and fascists, all of whom opposed both gay activists and paedophiles. On the Left, that made speaking out about paedophile infiltration nearly impossible.
In 1979, Eileen Fairweather, a tyro journalist, was writing for Spare Rib, a feminist magazine. She was assigned to read the book Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which argued for lowering the age of consent to four. The author, Tom O’Carroll, was an early member of PIE who was later imprisoned for child-abuse. Fairweather recalls ‘anguished, earnest’ discussions about what to write. ‘I did draft something, arguing that the existing age of consent was not “patriarchal”, but protected children,’ she says. ‘But I never even dared show it to anyone.’ Paedophiles had so thoroughly infiltrated the gay movement by that time that if you dared criticise those calling for ‘child sexual liberation’ you were branded anti-gay.
LGBT And Paedophillia
It’s important to remember that prior to the 1990s the LGBT movement did not reject paedophillia. Almost all the paedophile organisations were founded and run by homosexuals of various gay organisations.
For example the British paedophile Organisation was founded from the South London Gay Liberation Front. They then teamed up with another org to create the Paedophile Information Exchange, whose members wiere in Scottish Homosexual Rights Group, Campaign for Homosexual Equality, Gay Youth etc.
Former curator of the International Archive for Gays and Lesbians, Jim Kepner hinted that all the historical figures whom homosexuals like to classify as “their own” were lovers of boys:
“If today we reject lovers of boys in our midst, then we better stop waving the banner of the ancient Greeks, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio, Alighieri and Shakespeare. It’s better for us to stop claiming them as part of our heritage if we do not expand our understanding of what it means to be gay today. ” (Thorstad 1991)
Only in the 1980s did the LGBT movement begin to distance itself from paedophiles. And they did so purely for tactical reasons.
“In a campaign for public sympathy, gays should be exposed as victims in need of protection in order to make straights feel awkward and sympathize with their oppressed status. To promote the image of a “gay victim” in the media, images should be used that reduce the general public’s sense of threat and increase the likelihood of gay victimization. From a practical point of view, this means that cheeky barbel in the skin, transvestites and masculine lesbians will not appear in homosexual commercials and public appearances. Conventional images of beautiful young people, older people and attractive women will take priority. It goes without saying that groups that are in the farthest limits of acceptability, such as NAMBLA should not participate in such a campaign at all – potential child molesters will never look like victims».
Kirk & Madsen, After The Ball
Harry Hay, the ‘father of the gay movement’ who founded the first homosexual organisations in USA like Mattachine Society and Radical Fairies. Even as the LGBT movement tried to expel the most outrageous openly paedophiles from their ranks Harry Hay was still able to attend a march with a poster saying Nambla walks behind me.
In 1995 the LGBT Guide Magazine stated:
“We can be proud that the gay movement was home to those few voices who had the courage to say out loud that the children are naturally sexual and deserve the right to have sexual expression with whoever they choose. Instead of being afraid of being known as pedophiles, we should proudly declare that sex is good, including childish sexuality. We must do this for the sake of the children. ”
(Baldwin xnumx)
In 1999 in the Journal of Homosexuality we read:
“The relationship between a man / boy and a woman / girl is undoubtedly a homosexual relationship and it is an aspect of gay and lesbian life.” (Graupner 1999)
As the West continues down it’s licentious behaviour it is actively teaching it’s children to be LGBT. As the West has nothing more to offer humanity but a face of decay and a cult of death it will continue to degenerate.
