The Corbynista movement has been re-energised by social-democrats by Zarah Sultanna and Jeremy Corbyn leaving the genocidal Labour party filled with war criminals. Though Zarah Sultana came out as an “anti-zionist”… a few years after the complete flattening of Gaza and the murder of hundreds of thousands of people – Corbyn was quick to remind the entire world what a spineless cretin he was.
Look at his double talk and remind yourself that the IHRA definition of anti-semitism includes common criticism of Israel.
Which brings to a general point? Are the Corbynistas a threat to the ruling establishment or do they operate within establishment confines?
Or could it be third option
C) The Corbynistas themselves are a product of the ruling oligarchy.
Let’s take a look at a bourgeois think tank that a lot of Corbynistas have gone through.
NEON, New Economic Organisers Network that runs training and support campaigns up and down the country. Prominent Corbynistas that have had NEON training are Grace Blakely and Sam Tarry who ran Corbyns leadership campaign.
During this period, I received media training from the New Economic Organisers Network, and began to appear much more frequently in the media as a defender of left economic policies
https://graceblakeley.substack.com/p/no-one-is-coming-to-save-you
John McDonnel personally endorsed the NEON organisatino. They’re handed scripts on how to talk about certain issues. Check their website to see what I mean but I’ll read a few here.
Now we might want to find out who funds NEON to get a good idea of the interests putting money into educating Corbynistas in speaking and campaigning. Their funding document is conveniently on their website where they push Malthusian degrowth (the green agenda). When we come down to their funding we can see the bourgeois “philantrhopic” parasites that fund NEON.
Including the Open Society Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Green New Deal, Hewlett and Flora Foundation.
Open Society Foundation surely needs no introduction but I’ll do one anyway. The Open Society Foundation was setup by a disciple of Karl Popper, George Soros. It takes it’s name “Open society” from the Open Society theory in Karl Poppers work. The Open Society is the concept that Liberalism cannot tolerate illiberalism otherwise the illiberalism will abolish liberalism. In other words it was a raw defence of capitalism in the post-World War 2 era. Directly attacking Marxism as well as the works of Plato. A lot of the Western philosophy relies on Plato. St Augustine who wrote City of God and Confessions was a neoplatonist for example. Popper view both the Marxsits and Neoplatonists with equal contempt which corresponds to today where the liberals hate anything illiberal and immediately view it as a threat. If they don’t defer to liberal institutions or liberal/urban sentiment etc.
In other words Karl Popper and his even more extreme contemporary, Leo Strauss, turned liberalism into a new totalitarianism for fear of liberalism disappearing and the deep belief in Fukuyamas End of history speech when the Cold War was won by the capitalist pigs.
Kier Starmer is actually a perfect disciple of Karl Popper by his imprisoning of people for speech that speak out against migrants and the massive waves of illegal migration many of the foundations I’m discussing facilitate here.
But back to the Open Society Foundation: Soros runs the Open Society Foundation like his own privatised CIA. Indeed all these foundations may be considered privatised CIA’s by decadent, effete and corrupt imperialist bourgeois criminals.
Onto the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockefeller Foundation has previously been described by a supreme court justice as a State within the State.
In fact if you want a pretty detailed overview of the Rockefeller Foundations crimes you can go view my conversation with Michelle Stirling.
You can also read Jacob Nordangards excellent book The Rockefellers: Controlling the game. He details in that book with more references than you can shake a stick at how the Rockefellers and their Foundation were the prime movers and shakers in creating the behemoth we now call the Climate change movement. Again it’s not a surprise that this dovetails completely with NEON who are pushing this same Malthusian deindustrialisation disguised as “progressivism”.
I write so often on the Rockefeller Foundation that you should’ve already seen a lot of work writing on them and if you’ve not can go to www.diplomaticpost.co.uk and read a bunch of articles on the titan that is the Rockefeller Foundation.
The Hewlett and Flora Foundation wonderfully tie this together. As I showed in my article when the imperialist bourgeois criminals were pushing euthanasia through British parliament, Hewlett and Flora Foundation were one of the main backers of Kim Leadbeaters group, More in Common. You can feel free to read that article.
In that article I showed how
One of the primary funders of More in Common, the group that financed the above adverts all over London, is the William and and Flora Hewlett Foundation. They sought to portray “killing as care”. This is nothing new of course the Nazis did the same thing with their film they released to propagandise the Aktion T4 program titled Ich Klage.
This foundation has had as it’s primary goals in depopulation which they have titled The Population Program.
On page 2 of their documents you can read
The Program pursues two complementary goals:
• to enhance and protect the reproductive health and rights of
individuals and
• to stabilize global populations at levels that promote social and
economic well-being and sustain the environment
Whilst being obsessed with population growth
Although family planning programs have succeeded globally in meeting many contraceptive needs and reducing population growth rates, progress has been highly uneven between and within regions and countries. Many areas of urgent need remain. 2
Despite the success in reducing unwanted fertility, the work that lies ahead may be even more
daunting than that faced in the past. As the U.N.’s projections recognize, “the realization of these
projections is contingent on ensuring that couples have access to family planning. . . . The
potential for considerable population increase remains high.”4 In order to meet the U.N.’s
“medium variant” prediction depicted in Figure 1 to reach 8.9 billion by 2050, fertility rates must
fall from 2.83 currently to 2.02 on a global scale, including reductions from 5.22 to 2.4 in Africa
and from 2.72 to 1.91 in Asia
So you have a number of the most arch reactionary imperialist criminals funding the training of the Corbynista movement and giving them advice on how to push for wealth taxes whilst pushing “progressive” green policies.
Which are regressive in fact as they destroy British industry and allow the oligarchy in Britain to strangle the forces of production and retard technical progress by putting arbitrary limits on the potential of humanity by inflating energy to an exorbitant amount.
So what are we to make of the Corbynista movement? It appears to be little more than a creation of the most reactionary sections of the bourgeoisie that would actually like to see “wealth taxes” because they believe in allowing some meager distribution to prevent any serious social conflict. To hand out a few breadcrumbs to prevent the bakery being set on fire so to speak.
If you pulled out the Malthusian bourgeois drek inserted into this movement, like the Green new deal, which aims to destroy the working classes access to energy and put them back in a dark age, you’ll see there is very little to be garnered by this movement of Malthusian Professional Managerials and apologists for the Labour Party.
Who broke with the labour party not over their genocide and criminality in Gaza.
Not after their mass repression of speech in Britain that sees many more Britons in prison for facebook and twitter posts. But over the creation of a new party when Corbyn had already spent his relevance in British politics. I’ll leave it for the reader to decide. Is there anything to be garnered by these washed up reformers? Leave a note in the comments.
