The Anglo Death Cult And Return Of the Discredited Eugenics
In my podcast with Michelle Stirling we discussed at length the eugenics movements tentacles on the climate movement. The book Death and Deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900-1945 was discussed.
The eugenics programs in Germany were undertaken as a clearing of the decks for World War 3.
The ‘euthanasia’ programme for adults was very much bound up with clearing the decks in order to wage war. Hitler and his subordinates did not slither into it through contingent circumstances; nor did bureaucratic mechanisms assume a life of their own in the way that some historians imagine was the case with the ‘Final Solution’. (Death and Deliverance, p3)
What then are we to make of:
Canada’s MAID program has already waged a genocide on the Working Class as the program continually expands and widens as it’s practitioners get de-sensitised to death.
When all data sources are considered, the total number of medically assisted deaths reported in Canada since the introduction of federal MAID legislation in 2016 is 44,958.(Government of Canada, Fourth annual report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2022)
The Guardian ran a piece on a 29 year old who chose to end her life. For some reason they thought including seductive pictures of this mentally ill woman was correct.
The bourgeoisie know that even mentioning suicide in media has an uptick in suicides and the media have been trained on this for decades. It is also why the Anglo death cult pushes suicide in TV shows and now sultry pieces in the Guardian.
The Netflix show “13 Reasons Why” was associated with a 28.9% increase in suicide rates among U.S. youth ages 10-17 in the month (April 2017) following the show’s release, source (https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2019/release-of-13-reasons-why-associated-with-increase-in-youth-suicide-rates)
So when BBC and Guardian are glorifying euthanasia: whether it’s BBC targeting it’s old population or Guardian putting sultry pictures of that 29 year old dutch girl who chose to be killed by the Dutch state or Netflix produce rotten drot “culture” about glorifying suicide it is purely a physical attack on the working class.
Canada And The Rehabiliation of Ukrainian Fascism
Canada has played a major role in the resurgence of Nazism in general and Ukrainian Fascism in particular. Western historians white washing the crimes of the Ukrainian Banderites and offered safe refuge in the West. The OUN was the Organisation for Ukrainian Nationalists and participated in the holocaust alongside the Nazis.
But the OUN storm troopers, like any terrorist group, prized action over theory. Their wartime brutalities have been amply documented (Voice, February 11, 1986, “To Catch a Nazi”). They recruited for the Waffen SS, pulled the triggers at Babi Yar and Sobibor, ran the gas chamber at Treblinka. During their brief interludes of Nazi-sponsored “independence” (in the Carpatho-Ukraine in 1939 and in Galicia in 1941), pogroms were the order of the day, in the spirit of their revered Simon Petlura. They strove to outdo the Nazis at every turn.
And when the Third Reich fell, the nationalists fled — to Munich, to Toronto, and (with the covert aid of the U.S. State Department, which viewed them as potential anti-Soviet guerrillas) to New York and Chicago and Cleveland. (Village Voice, In Search of a Soviet Holocaust, January 12, 1988)
People seem to forget that the beastial behaviour of the Germans during this period was matched by the bestiality of the rest of Europe. The OUN acted as the hired hands of the Nazis. After World War 2 Canada became a haven for these people.
A fast track method into Canada was by showing your SS Tattoo.
One way of getting into postwar Canada “was by showing the SS tattoo,” Canadian historian Irving Abella told “60 Minutes” interviewer Mike Wallace. “This proved that you were an anti-Communist.” (Jweekly, Canada admits letting in 2,000 Ukrainian SS troopers, February 7, 1997)
These Ukrainians in exile could then be weaponised against the Soviet Union (and now Russian Federation – Proving their whining about “communism” was not true but their deep race hatred and slavishness to the West).
Whilst Western historians rewrote history
In the view of such historians, perpetrators were objective, exact and emotionally detached. Survivors, on the other hand, were considered to be emotional, traumatized, and not able to produce any reliable account of the events. This approach was typical of historians such as the OUN specialist John Armstrong, and some German historians such as Martin Broszat, Thilo Vogelsang, and Andreas Hillgruber, who had grown up in Nazi Germany and served in the German army. Similarly, some leading Holocaust historians such as Raul Hilberg and the first director of Yad Vashem, Ben-Zion Duner, also applied this approach. Historians such as Joseph Wulf or Léon Poliakov, who objected to the perpetrator-oriented approach, were mainly Holocaust survivors themselves. They were discredited especially by the German historians as “unscholarly.” (Stepan Bandera The Life and Afterlife of a Ukrainian Nationalist )
Whilst, bizarrely, this gaggle of propagandists claimed the perpetrators of the holocaust, followers of Stepan Bandera and members of the OUN, were more reliable than the victims and survivors.
For a long time, historians who studied the Holocaust, or movements such as the OUN, concentrated on perpetrator documents and overlooked the testimonies, memoirs, reports, and other accounts left by survivors. Those historians believed that the perpetrator documents hold much more reliable data than the documents left by survivors, victims, and bystanders.(ibid p34)
Whilst the OUN’s main aim was not Communism (as the Soviet Union was a dignified socialist country run by Communists at the time) but building an empire on the ruin of the “asiatics”.
Confident that it had the spirits of Bohdan Khmel’nyts’kyi, Taras Shevchenko, Mykola Mikhnovs’kyi, and Ievhen Konovalets’ on its side, the OUN-B wanted not only to found a state for the “Ukrainian race” but also to struggle for other “nations of Eastern Europe and Asia enslaved by Moscow, for a new order on the ruins of the Moscow Empire, the USSR.” For this reason, the “Ukrainian National Revolution” was planned to take place not only in the “living space” of the “Ukrainian race.” The OUN-B also wanted to inspire a number of other “nations enslaved by Moscow” and involve them in the “liberation struggle” against the Soviet Union. This was to take place under the slogan: “Freedom for the Nations and the Individual!” (ibid p162)
In Hitlers last speech, already aware the Third Reich was coming to an end he pushed the same sentiment.
However grave the crisis may be at the moment, it will, despite everything, finally be mastered by our unalterable will, by our readiness for sacrifice and by our abilities. We shall overcome this calamity, too, and this fight, too, will not be won by central Asia but by Europe; and at its head will be the nation that has represented Europe against the East for 1,500 years and shall represent it for all times: our Greater German Reich, the German nation.
The Ukrainian Nationalists (it would be more apt to describe them as Cosmopolitans working for other nations) began their “National Revolution” with Operation Barbarossa and the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union.
The “Ukrainian National Revolution” began simultaneously with Operation Barbarossa, in the early hours of 22 June 1941, when Nazi Germany—supported by troops from Finland, Hungary, Italy, Romania, and Slovakia—attacked the Soviet Union. About 800 OUN-B activists in four task forces, which were divided into groups of five to twelve members, followed the German army eastward through the Ukrainian territories. ibid p177)
To welcome the Germans and signalize support for the new Ukrainian state, the OUN-B instructed local Ukrainians to erect triumphal arches.[1027] During the “Ukrainian National Revolution,” triumphal arches of various kinds were indeed erected in numerous villages, towns, and cities. They were decorated with the Ukrainian and German flags and such inscriptions as “Glory to Ukraine—Glory to Bandera!” “Long Live the German Army!” “Long Live the Leader of the German Nation Adolf Hitler!” “Freedom for Ukraine—Death to Moscow!” “Glory to Our Leader [Providnyk] Stepan Bandera!” (Figs. 19–20).[1028] In Volhynia, the triumphal arches were ubiquitous, and mainly bore the inscriptions “Heil Hitler!” and “Glory to Ukraine!” (ibid p199)
If you’re wondering why Ukrainian children since 2014 (the CIA backed coup of Ukraines government) are screaming “Death to Muscovites” it’s because this ideology has taken hold here.
However the Banderite dream collapsed. The Nazi’s had no use for a Ukrainian State the Banderites had dreamt of. Stepan Bandera was arrested by the Nazi’s and thrown into prison. The Nazi’s had viewed Ukrainians as subhumans and marked the Ukrainian territory for extermination and German settlement under General Plan Ost. 65% of Ukrainians were to be marked for deportation or murder.
Ukraine did not become an independent state as the Ukrainian nationalists wanted, but life for Ukrainians in Galicia under German occupation was not very different from the life of collaborating national groups in states like Slovakia or Croatia. In contrast, the policies toward Ukrainians in Reichskommissariat Ukraine were much harsher. The Nazis treated the Reichskommissariat as a colony and the Ukrainians there were simply to supply the Reich with grain.[1186] All universities were closed down and education was limited to four years of primary school. [1187] In two decades, Himmler planned to have a system of exclusively German cities at the intersections of highways and railroads in the Reichskommissariat.[1188] Because the Ukrainian territories were to be settled with Germans and some Ukrainians were to be enslaved and others “eliminated,” the Nazis regarded the eastern Ukrainians simply as a labor force. (ibid p225)
35% were to be Germanised.
As OUN-B were imprisoned or killed by the Nazi’s the Banderite Dream began to collapse.
Until Nazi Germany began losing the war.
Cosmopolitan Banderites Attach Themselves To USA and England
Though the Ukrainian Nationalists have claimed they acted for the Ukrainian Nation. Their actions and words have shown otherwise. They act for the Cosmopolitan Imperialists and are happy to change out masters as they see fit. The Banderites first attached themselves to Nazi Germany
In July 1941 Stepan Bandera was arrested by the very people he had welcomed with open arms into Ukraine.
On 5 July 1941, Bandera was taken to Berlin and was placed in Ehrenhaft (honorable captivity), the following day.[1148] Stets’ko wrote to Bandera from Lviv, asking what he should do and whether he should inform the masses that the Providnyk had been imprisoned. He also encouraged Bandera to negotiate with the Nazis. Stets’ko survived an assassination attempt on 8 July but was arrested the following day. On the night of 11 July, Abwehr officer Alfons Paulus escorted him by train from Cracow to Berlin. Stets’ko was released from arrest on 12 July, as was Bandera on 14 July, both on condition that they report regularly to the police.[1149] They stayed together in an apartment house on Dahlmannstrasse in BerlinCharlottenburg. (ibid p220)
The Nazi’s then treated Ukraine as a colony.
Ukraine did not become an independent state as the Ukrainian nationalists wanted, but life for Ukrainians in Galicia under German occupation was not very different from the life of collaborating national groups in states like Slovakia or Croatia. In contrast, the policies toward Ukrainians in Reichskommissariat Ukraine were much harsher. The Nazis treated the Reichskommissariat as a colony and the Ukrainians there were simply to supply the Reich with grain.[1186] All universities were closed down and education was limited to four years of primary school. [1187] In two decades, Himmler planned to have a system of exclusively German cities at the intersections of highways and railroads in the Reichskommissariat.[1188] Because the Ukrainian territories were to be settled with Germans and some Ukrainians were to be enslaved and others “eliminated,” the Nazis regarded the eastern Ukrainians simply as a labor force.(ibid p225)
But as the Nazi war machine began to be systematically dismantled by the heroic Red Army, the Nazi’s freed Stepan Bandera to organise the Banderites against the Soviets.
In a bulletin on 14 November the OUN announced that “the Leader Stepan Bandera is free.”[1397] The Nazis had released Bandera and some other special political prisoners from Zellenbau because Germany was losing the war and wanted to organize Russians, Ukrainians, and other Eastern Europeans for the last struggle against the Red Army. Sima and other legionaries had already been released at the end of August 1944, following which they established a Romanian government in Vienna. This was intended to motivate Romanians to support Hitler and to mobilize them to fight against the Soviet Union. (ibid p254)
With the increasing collapse of Nazi Germany the OUN-B quickly surrendered to the Anglo-Saxons. The people that engendered World War 2 drew up plans to bomb the Soviet Union under Operation Pike (when they had already declared the Phoney War against Germany), encouraged Nazi Germany at the Munich Betrayal, refused to give the Soviet Union any substantial material assistance before they had broken the back of Nazi Germany at Stalingrad and Kursk.
During World War 2 Churchill wrote up Operation Unthinkable – a plan to re-arm the German Wehrmacht and have them invade the Soviet Union.
The cosmopolitan Banderites simply rewrote history though portraying themselves as enemies of Nazi Imperialism.
For the sake of collaboration with the Allies however, the OUN-B and UPA kept the collaboration with the Germans a secret, portrayed itself as the enemy of “Nazi imperialism,” and applied in this matter a propaganda strategy similar to that regarding the ethnic cleansing of Poles and the murder of Jews.(ibid, p250)
Though the OUN-B frequently claimed after the Second World War that the UPA was fighting against the totalitarian Soviet Union for a nationalist democratic Ukraine, the reference to democracy was nothing more than a pretence, intended to persuade the United Kingdom and the United States to provide support for the insurgent movement.(ibid p256)
With the closure of World War 2 the Banderites did not give up hope. They insisted the English and Americans would soon be at war with the Soviet Union.
At the end of June [1945] in village Lyshnevychi in Brody raion, rebels convened a village assembly, [using their] weapons to force local peasants into the meeting. The chairman of the village soviet was led into the meeting [at the point of] two tommy guns and seated at the presidium. … Speaking at the meeting, a rebel whose name was not given said: “You, peasants. The Bolsheviks and the NKVD men, who want to build a Belomor canal with the bones of the Ukrainian people, say that the war [with the Germans] is over. And this is true, but this does not concern us because we are only just beginning the true war for ‘the independence of Ukraine.’ England and America will help us. Our representatives have already agreed with England on this question, and even the Bolshevik Manul’s’kyi has agreed to it. You should not fulfill the demands of the Soviets because anyone who works [for them] will be hanged as a traitor to the Ukrainian land. We have more power, you can see that for yourselves. Soon the Bolsheviks will conduct a grain levy. If anyone of you carries grain to the stations, then we will kill you like a dog, and your family will be hanged and cut to pieces. That should be understandable enough. And if you understand, then get back to your homes.”(ibid p270)
Banderites – Dogs Of Mi6 and CIA
Just as mi6 were principle in deposing British Prime Minister Harold Wilson in a coup, so too has the CIA been amply implicated in targetting it’s own people. The CIA has engaged in assassinating it’s own President (John F Kennedy), has trafficked crack into American’s neighbourhoods to raise funds for regime change wars.
These two intelligence services operate as foreign agents on American/British soil. Their defence has a class content – they are beholden to the imperialist class based in London/Washington. They allow monsters like Jeffrey Epstein and Jimmy Saville into the heart of power who rape young English and American women. Partly to satisfy the sexual pathology of the imperialist class (who are decadent beyond belief) and partly as honey pots for their intelligence operations and social control. These same forces worked with the Banderites to cover up their crimes in the holocaust as a weapon against the Soviet people.
The American and British intelligence services were already taking an interest in Nazis and Nazi collaborators, before the end of the war. They were also interested in people and organizations, such as the German Military Intelligence on the Eastern Front (Fremde Heere Ost, FHO), and the various Eastern European far-right movements, including the OUN, who could provide them with information about the Soviet Union or who possessed other valuable knowledge. With the help of the CIA, Reinhard Gehlen, former head of the FHO, established the Federal Intelligence Service (Bundesnachrichtendienst, BND), the intelligence service of West Germany. American intelligence protected Gehlen and his advisers.(ibid p280)
People such as Bandera, who could either provide information about the Soviet Union or mobilize the émigré communities with anticommunist propaganda or had contact with underground organizations behind the Iron Curtain, were of special interest to the American, British, and German intelligence services. Besides Ukrainians, there were also Croatians, Slovaks, Russians, Poles, Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Romanians, and Hungarians who worked for Western intelligence services. That some of them had collaborated with the Nazis and were involved in war crimes did not matter, as long as they were useful for the Cold War. American and British intelligence possessed knowledge, although not always very accurate, about the people with whom they worked.[1579] Harry Rositzke, former head of the CIA, commented in 1985: “It was a visceral business of using any bastard as long as he was anticommunist … [and] the eagerness or desire to enlist collaborators meant that sure, you didn’t look at their credentials too closely.” (ibid p280)
Canada’s Role In Rehabilitating Nazism
Chrystia Freeland is a Banderite that reached the height of the Canadian government. Here she is holding a scarf representing
The red and black flag has historically represented the Bandera movement in Ukraine. Stepan Bandera was a Nationalist Ukrainian politician during the Second World War who is accused of war crimes and leading atrocities against Jewish and Polish people. (TNC news, Freeland caught holding pro-Nazi banner at Ukraine protest, Feb 28 2022)
Perhaps more dramatic than this Banderite holding a Banderite scarf though is the Canadian parliament doing a standing ovation for one of the few remaining Nazi’s left alive, Yaroslav Hunka. As a member of the SS this Hitlerite directly swore allegiance to Hitler.
Given the facts around Canada’s role in rehabilitating Nazism and Ukrainian Fascism. A question has to be asked?
Are the eugenics programs in Canada that are ramping up “clearing the decks” for World War 3?
“Conscription” is being mentioned in Britain, France and Germany. The British Army is now running adverts of exclusively white men rather than the mixed race cosmopolitan soup they usually do, including a 2018 advert of a muslim praying.
With the British Army now running adverts featuring only white men, you better believe they’re taking us to war.